Draft Blogger's Code of Conduct(博客行为守则(草案))

Tim O'Reilly Tim O'Reilly 04.08.2007

When I wrote my Call for a Blogging Code of Conduct last week, I suggested some ideas of what such a code might contain, but didn't actually put forth a draft that people could subscribe to. We're not quite there yet, but we have a plan.

We've drafted a code of conduct that will eventually be posted on bloggingcode.org, and created a badge that sites can display if they want to link to that code of conduct. Civility Enforced Badge

But because we want a period of review, we don't want to finalize that code yet. I've put a draft below (and you'll see it's based closely on the BlogHer Community Guidelines that I linked to last week.) But we're also working with wikia to put the draft through a wiki-based review process on blogging.wikia.com. (There's an easy to remember shortcut link at http://blogging.wikia.com/wiki/BCC) Please feel free to join in and edit the wiki as well as encouraging others to do so. We'll post the final version on bloggingcode.org, along with the html to display the badge and link to the code.

(While wikis are great for developing the code, we don't want it to be a moving target once people have signed up for it.)

Here's the first draft:

We celebrate the blogosphere because it embraces frank and open conversation. But frankness does not have to mean lack of civility. We present this Blogger Code of Conduct in hopes that it helps create a culture that encourages both personal expression and constructive conversation.

1. We take responsibility for our own words and for the comments we allow on our blog.

We are committed to the "Civility Enforced" standard: we will not post unacceptable content, and we'll delete comments that contain it.

We define unacceptable content as anything included or linked to that:
- is being used to abuse, harass, stalk, or threaten others
- is libelous, knowingly false, ad-hominem, or misrepresents another person,
- infringes upon a copyright or trademark
- violates an obligation of confidentiality
- violates the privacy of others

We define and determine what is "unacceptable content" on a case-by-case basis, and our definitions are not limited to this list. If we delete a comment or link, we will say so and explain why. [We reserve the right to change these standards at any time with no notice.]

2. We won't say anything online that we wouldn't say in person.

3. We connect privately before we respond publicly.

When we encounter conflicts and misrepresentation in the blogosphere, we make every effort to talk privately and directly to the person(s) involved--or find an intermediary who can do so--before we publish any posts or comments about the issue.

4. When we believe someone is unfairly attacking another, we take action.

When someone who is publishing comments or blog postings that are offensive, we'll tell them so (privately, if possible--see above) and ask them to publicly make amends.
If those published comments could be construed as a threat, and the perpetrator doesn't withdraw them and apologize, we will cooperate with law enforcement to protect the target of the threat.

5. We do not allow anonymous comments.

We require commenters to supply a valid email address before they can post, though we allow commenters to identify themselves with an alias, rather than their real name.

6. We ignore the trolls.

We prefer not to respond to nasty comments about us or our blog, as long as they don't veer into abuse or libel. We believe that feeding the trolls only encourages them--"Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, but the pig likes it." Ignoring public attacks is often the best way to contain them.

anythinggoes2.jpg We also decided we needed an "anything goes" badge for sites that want to warn possible commenters that they are entering a free-for-all zone. The text to accompany that badge might go something like this:

This is an open, uncensored forum. We are not responsible for the comments of any poster, and when discussions get heated, crude language, insults and other "off color" comments may be encountered. Participate in this site at your own risk.

翻译:司亮,sniffer

上周当我呼吁应该有一个博客行为公约或者规范的时候,谈了关于这样一个规范有可能包含哪些内容,但当时并没有一个更具体的草案。现在我们已经有了一些更清楚的想法了。

我们起草了一个行为守则并且最终要把它放到bloggingcode.org上。还创造了一个“Civility Enforced”徽标,如果网站希望连接到这个行为守则可以把这个徽标放到自己的网站上。

我们希望能有一段时间来讨论、推敲这个文本,所以并没有把它最终确定下来。我把这个草稿写在下面(你会发现实际上它很大程度是基于我上周提到的“BlogHer社区守则”)。同时还将这个草稿放在blogging.wikia.com,希望通过Wiki的方式来讨论之,http://blogging.wikia.com/wiki/BCC。我们热切地希望您和您身边的朋友参与进来。最终版本将放在bloggingcode.org,还会包括连接至“博客行为守则”和我们做的徽标所需的html代码。

第一稿:

“我们推崇博客,因为它带来了坦诚的交谈、对话。但坦诚并不一定意味着文明的缺失。我们提出这个博客行为守则希望有助于创造一种风气,来同时鼓励个人的表达和建设性的对话。

1. 我们为自己的观点和语言负责,也为我们的博客网站上的那些评论负责。

我们承诺遵守“ Civility Enforced(文明实行)”标准:我们不会发表“不可接受的内容”,而且我们会删除有类似内容的评论。

我们将任何包含或连接到下面类似问题的内容定义为“不可接受的内容”:

-涉及辱骂、骚扰、恐吓或威胁他人;
-中伤、欺骗、人身攻击、歪曲他人;
-侵犯版权或商标;
-违反了保密义务;
-违反了他人隐私。

我们会根据具体情况来定义和判断“不可接受的内容”,我们的定义也不局限在上面这个列表。如果我们删除了一条评论或链接我们会给出解释。(我们保留在没有通知的情况下改变这个标准的权利。)

2. 现实生活中我们不会讲的话在网上我们也不会讲。

3. 我们在公开回应之前首先私下接触一下以交换意见。

当我们在博客圈子里遇到冲突或者误传,我们会尽一切努力在公开发表任何关于此事的言论之前直接和相关的人(或者找到一个调解人)来做私人间的对话。

4. 当我们确信某人不公平地攻击他人时,我们会行动起来。

当有人发表攻击性的评论或博客文章时,我们会提醒他们(私下场合,如果可能,请参见上面第三点),并且要求他们公开做出道歉。

如果这些所发表的言论可以被认为是一种威胁,而且行为人不收回并做出道歉,我们将与法律机构合作以保护受到威胁的对象。

5. 我们不允许匿名评论。

我们要求博客评论者提供一个有效的电子邮件地址才可以发布他的内容,当然我们允许评论者使用一个别名而不是真实姓名。

6. 我们不理睬挑衅(troll)

我们宁愿不回应那些针对我们自己以及我们的博客的不友善的评论,只要它们不演变成辱骂或者诽谤。我们相信回应挑衅只会鼓励他们。“永远不要和一头猪摔跤。你和猪都会搞得一身脏,但是猪喜欢这样。” 很多时候不理会那些攻击是抑制他们的最好办法。”

我们还认为我们需要一个“anything goes”徽标来警告大家:你们正在进入一个“free-for-all”区域。伴随这个徽标的进一步说明文字可能是下面这样:

“这是一个开放、没有监管的论坛. 我们不对任何评论者的评论负责,如果讨论变得激烈,有可能遇到粗鲁的言语、侮辱和一些不得体的评论。参加者风险自负。”

Discussion

Enter your comment (wiki syntax is allowed):
blog/draft_blogger_s_code_of_conduct.txt · 最后更改: 2008/09/05 由 radarman
O'Reilly Home | Privacy Policy ©2005-2009, O'Reilly Media, Inc.
All trademarks and registered trademarks appearing on oreilly.com are the property of their respective owners.