Mike Loukides
2008-10-30
|
Yesterday, Andrew Sheppard pointed me at a desktop 3D printer for under $5000. That brought back some memories... In the early 80s, I worked for Imagen, the company that made the first laser printer that sold for under $20,000, the first laser printer that sold for under $10,000, and the first laser printer that sold for under $7,000. We didn't make the first laser printer that sold for under $5,000. That was Apple's first LaserWriter, and although the company survived for a few years more, it's really what did us in. $5000 is still pricey for a desktop product, but it's plausible for a shared office printer. If Desktop Factory can get a few more thousand off the price, they'll have a viable personal product. Why couldn't Imagen get to $5000, when Apple could? The printers were really very similar: they used the same Canon marking engine (and hence, identical print speed, resolution, image quality, and reliability). Apple's was PostScript-based, but at the time there weren't any other PostScript printers. We had a clever architecture that used a lot less memory--and this was back when RAM was hundreds of dollars per megabyte wholesale. Most of the cost of a printer, once you paid for the mechanical parts, was in the memory. But even with our memory-stingy printers, Apple had enough buying power to drive their costs below ours. We were selling a couple of hundred units a month; I don't know how many units Apple sold, but I'm sure they were buying the same memory for their Apple IIs, Lisas (remember those?) and early Macs. So we lost the battle to economies of scale, and that's a battle that's hard to win when you're playing against a company a hundred times your size. It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the 3D printer market. Desktop Factory looks a lot like Imagen: an aggressive, focused startup built around one product. Desktop printers probably aren't built around commodity parts, like processors and memory (and, for that matter, the Canon marking engine); the commodity parts are now much cheaper (RAM is pennies a meg). But what happens when HP or Apple gets into the game? Will Desktop Factory be the first to sell a 3D printer for hobbyists, or will we have to wait for Apple? The LaserWriter drove standardization on PostScript, which in turn drove a new generation of text editors and typesetting products. That work is continuing with products like InDesign. 3D CAD software strikes me as being roughly where text editing and page layout was in the 80s. Is Desktop Factory the company that will drive a renaissance in 3D design tools? Will their printer interface become a de-facto standard that allows others to play? That's what it will take for them to survive. These days, Imagen doesn't even merit an entry in Wikipedia. |
翻译:xiaochong 昨天Andrew Sheppard告诉我一款低于5000美元的桌面3D打印机,这让我想起一些往事…… 上世纪八十年代早期我在Imagen工作,当时这家公司推出了第一款低于20000美元的激光打印机,第一款低于10000美元的激光打印机,以及第一款低于7000美元的打印机。我们没能达到5000美元以下。Apple的第一款LaserWriter则做到了,尽管他们后来公司又发生很多事情,但5000美元以下的激光打印机足以将我们挤出市场。 5000美元作为一个桌面产品还是有点贵,但作为大家共享的办公室打印机没有问题。如果Desktop Factory能再降低几千美元就可以成为一个可行的个人产品了。 为什么Imagen做不到5000美元以下而Apple却做到了?打印机都差不多:Apple也用同样的佳能打印引擎(所以打印速度、分辨率、图片质量以及可靠性都一样)。Apple的打印机是PostScript打印机,那时候没有其他PostScript打印机。我们当时有一个非常好的架构,大量减少了使用的内存——要知道当时1M内存批发价要几百美元。打印机成本中一大部分不再是机械部分而是内存的成本了。 尽管我们的打印机节省内存,Apple还是有足够的购买力将成本控制得比我们低。我们一个月销售几百台;我不知道Apple的销售量,但我肯定他们为Apple II、Lisa(还记得吗?)和早期Mac以及激光打印机购入同样的内存。所以我们输给了规模经济,你很难赢得与比你大几百倍的公司的竞争。 关注一下3D打印机市场的突破会非常有趣。Desktop Factory和Imagen很相似:一个富于进取、围绕单一产品展开的创业公司。桌面打印机不是用商品化部件构建的,比如处理器和内存(以及佳能打印引擎);商品化部件现在可便宜多了。但是如果HP或Apple加入竞争会怎么样?Desktop Factory会第一个把3D打印机卖给爱好者?或者一定要等Apple? LaserWrite推动了PostScript标准化,后者又推进了新一代的文本编辑器和排版系统,一直持续到现在像InDesign这样的产品。3D CAD软件在我看来大致相当于八十年代的文本编辑和排版软件的阶段。Desktop Factory会推进3D设计工具的复兴吗?其打印接口会成为大家都遵守的事实标准吗?这些都将使该公司得以存活下去。Imagen现在甚至在Wikipedia上都消失了。 |
Discussion
很酷的产品。如果商品化一定会推动很多方面的进程,零售业,物流,设计……
看这哥们回忆往事,挺凄凉的。陈年往事想起来别有一番滋味。