Nat Torkington
2008/05/13
|
Remember Gandhi's steps of a revolution? "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." For as long as I've known the term, ubiquitous computing has been largely ignored, written off as a scifi pipedream from the people who promised you AI and cars that would run on water. That's beginning to change, as hardware such as the Arduino and programmable mobile phone handsets enabling artists, researchers, and makers like Eric Paulos, Elizabeth Goodman, and Julian Bleecker to join the digital and physical worlds in new and interesting ways. Now that it's harder to ignore ubicomp we're seeing laughter. Nicholas Nova pointed to an article in Backbone Magazine where "Austin Williams, technical editor of the Architects’ Journal and director of Future Cities, a forum that critically explores city issues" wasn't so impressed with Paulos's work. "Williams, who calls such technology-driven projects indulgent, points to more urgent urban problems awaiting solutions, such as the loss of social connections between city dwellers." While not technically laughter, I put this belittling in the same bucket on Gandhi's progression. I think Williams is wrong because he fails to allow for the rate that technology matures. Those practical ubicompers like Paulos, Goodman, and Bleecker have only had affordable easy-to-program embedded hardware and open mobile handsets for a few years. They're explorers taking first steps on a new world. Explorers sometimes find gold, sometimes find deserts, sometimes get eaten. It's the nature of the game. The explorers I named would be the first to tell you they're not buliding products, things for wide deployment that are meant to be consumer-ready, shelf-demonstrable, and poised for their 30s spot after Leno's monologue. But in the legions of developers, hackers, hobbyists, alphageeks, and tinkerers who look at their work there will be some who see a product to build—the homesteaders who build cottages, shops, factories. From digital photo frames to the Chumby and the Dash (disclosure: O'Reilly Alpha Tech Ventures is an investor in the Chumby), we're seeing the first products emerge. Some of them will be like Roanoke Colony, some will be like New Amsterdam. The next wave of products is going to be really interesting, and in there I'm expecting to see things that tackle "the loss of social connections between city dwellers" and other matters that Williams was concerned about. That should go some way to silencing the laughter. Gandhi's progression invites the question: if next "they fight you", who will be fighting ubicomp devices? Not just those who fear wifi, but entrenched business interests. Any ideas? Leave them as comments below. (Updated with Julian's new URL) |
翻译:xiaochong 还记得甘地描述的革命之路吗?“最开始他们忽略你,然后嘲笑你,再接下来他们打击你,最后你胜利了。”自我知道这句话以来普适计算很大程度上一直被忽视,往往被看作科幻小说里的梦想,像小说里说的人工智能和能在水上跑的汽车。这一切正在改变,随着像Arduino和可编程移动电话手持设备这样的硬件设备发展,艺术家、研究人员和Eric Paulos、Elizabeth Goodman以及Julian Bleecker这样的玩家就能够将数字世界和现实世界以一种有趣崭新的方式连接起来。既然不能再忽视普适计算,嘲笑的人就出现了。 Nicholas Nova指出了Backbone杂志的一篇文章,称Austin Williams——Architects的技术编辑,未来城市(一个检讨城市问题的论坛)的主任——对Paulos的作品不以为然。“Williams称这样的技术驱动的项目意义不大,他指出了更多亟待解决的城市问题,比如城市居民之间的社交联系的缺失。”貌似不是嘲笑,我还是将其放入甘地革命之路里来看。 我认为Williams错了,因为他没有考虑到技术成熟的程度。像Paulos、Goodman和Bleecker这样的普适计算实践者掌握可承受的易编程嵌入硬件以及开放移动手持设备已经好几年了。他们是向新世界迈出第一步的探索者。探索者有时会发现金子,有时发现的是荒漠,有时把自己都搭上了。这都很正常。我提到的这些探索者会告诉你他们不是在作产品,不是在作那些给消费者广泛使用的东西,不是放在货架上的东西,也不是要上Leno节目后面那30秒广告的东西。 然而那些关心自己工作的大批开发人员、骇客、爱好者、超级极客可能会看到一些产品——农场主就会做一些农舍、店铺或者工厂。从数字相框到Chumby和Dash(透漏一下:O'Reilly风投投资了Chumby)我们正在目睹一些产品的出现。这其中有一些可能会失败,也有一些将是伟大的新的开始。下一批产品将会非常有趣,我期望能看到解决像“城市居民社交联系缺失”这样Williams关心的问题。那将会使嘲笑的人闭嘴。 甘地的革命之路让我想到一个问题:如果下一步“他们会打击你”,那谁会打击普适计算设备?不光是那些害怕Wifi的人,还会包括那些商业上的既得利益者。 |
Discussion